Norbert Gombos vs Kimmer Coppejans Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, Coppejans has won 42.54% of points on their second serve, while Gombos has clinched 47.27%.
• Return Game Statistics: Recently, Coppejans has managed to win 45.38% of opponent’s second-serve points compared to Gombos’ 48.52%. However, for first-serve returns, Coppejans leads with 29.59% against Gombos’ 26.34%.
• Pressure Situations: In recent matches, Coppejans has saved 52.7% of breakpoints, slightly better than Gombos who saved 51.05%.
• Performance Overview: Coppejans boasts a match win percentage of 73.91% over the last year, exceeding Gombos’ 60.29% win rate.
• Surface Preference: Coppejans performs best on Hard surfaces with a win rate of 62%, while Gombos excels on Clay with a 59% win rate.
• Level of Competition: Both players have competed predominantly in Challengers/ITF tournaments >$10K, with Coppejans winning 65% of his matches and Gombos 60.66%.
• Direct H2H Matches: Gombos leads with 4 wins to Coppejans’ 1 in head-to-heads. What could this mean for their next encounter? Coppejans' recent victory in Rome suggests potential for an upset.
• Set Durations and Decisions: Matches between them last an average of 1:28:36. Coppejans has won the sole deciding set and Gombos leads in tiebreaks.
• Opponent Quality: The average rank of players Coppejans has faced in the past year is 350.33, slightly higher than Gombos’ 375.74.
• Deciding Set Performance: In deciding sets over the last year, Coppejans holds a slight edge, winning 60% compared to Gombos’ 55%.
• Break Point Conversion: Coppejans has converted 40.83% of breakpoints, narrowly surpassing Gombos at 38.95%.

Editorial Prediction (May 13, 2025, UTC):

Considering recent performance data, Gombos displays superior second serve and return game efficiency, giving him an edge in service and return situations.

Coppejans showcases resilience under pressure with a slightly higher breakpoint save rate and a better win percentage in deciding sets, indicating potential strength in critical match junctures.

Although Gombos holds the upper hand in their overall head-to-head record, Coppejans’ recent victory and slightly better adaptability in crucial moments suggest a competitive match ahead.

Evaluating both players’ form, surface preferences, and competitive history, it appears that Gombos might have a slight upper hand, but don't rule out a Coppejans resurgence given his recent form.

Ultimately, based on the facts, Gombos is more likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming match, although it's expected to be closely contested.